U.S. Ambassador Terry Branstad leaving post to work on Trump Campaign + Disclosure by Chinese virologist of Wuhan lab complicity
Recently, American Ambassador Terry Branstad wrote the OP - Ed inserted below, for publication in China's state sponsored paper - The People's Daily. Branstad has been the American Ambassador to China for three years, has a friendly relationship with Xi Jinping, and was Iowa governor. Reuter's reported comments by The People's Daily's in refusing to publish Branstad's paper...“It is extremely ironic that on the one hand the U.S. side rudely and unreasonably supresses Chinese media like the People’s Daily as Communist Party ‘propaganda machines’, and on the other demands they disseminate wrong points of view for the United States.” Secretary of State - Mike Pompeo reacted to China's media refusing to publish Branstad's paper...“Their refusal to do so shows just how much China’s unelected Party elites fear their own people’s free-thinking and the free world’s judgment about their governance practices inside China.” Branstad and Xi formed a relationship over thirty years ago, though, America and China have forged a populist agenda within their respective countries extolling a return to expanding business in America and China seeking to expand its footprint across Asia , Europe, Africa and beyond with its Belt and Road Initiative. That Branstad supports Donald Trump and The Republican Party and America First policies, would have roiled Branstad's old friend and CPC Chairman - Xi. As the two countries decouple their economies, the departure of Branstad in October to work on Trump's campaign demonstrates there are few, if any, sacrificial lambs in this complex relationship, that is bordering on potential military conflict over Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, and human rights on the one hand, and security issues relating to tech powerhouses Huawei, Tencent and others, a phase two trade deal, and fairness for students, elected officials, and business leaders on both sides, on the other hand. America has a tremendous advantage relating to "soft power" that has been a by product of its democratic system. If China wants to become a world leader, it must embrace the international rules - based order to become a true global super-power. It appears, though, under, Xi, and given the implications of COVID - 19, that the central government has created a cleavage to master control of the South China Sea in a regional "wolf warrior" mentality. Based on Dr. Yan's following testimonial, Chinese authorities maintaining a tight grip on access to information, has led to the 21st c pandemic that is operating internationally with lifestyle changes that intend to permeate the global community for many years.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese - a virologist, fled China after being harassed by Chinese officials due to her "whistle-blowing" regarding the virus origins. Dr Li-Meng said that she conducted two researches on the “new pneumonia” in China between December and early January and the second one in mid-January, and shared the results with her supervisor, who is a World Health Organisation (WHO) consultant. She expected her supervisor to do the “right thing on behalf of the Chinese government and WHO” but to her surprise she was told to “maintain silence or else she would be made to disappear”, which the virologist said was common sense among the Chinese. As reported in The Hindustan Times on September 14, 2020.
Resetting the Relationship Based on Reciprocity
by
The Honorable Terry Branstad, U.S. Ambassador to China
We have long said we want a constructive, results-oriented relationship with China, and that view has not changed. A constructive relationship means that we are honest and candid not only about our shared interests, but also about the issues that divide us. We need not just endless reaffirmations of our respective interests, but concrete outcomes that truly benefit our peoples.
From a U.S. perspective, we have made too little progress. For years, the Chinese leadership has urged us to focus on areas of cooperation while setting aside our differences, and for years, the United States had agreed to that approach in the expectation that, over time, we would address our concerns as well. But the Chinese leadership has exploited this approach. Often it has insisted we sweep differences under the table as a prerequisite for engagement. Sometimes it made promises to address our concerns yet failed to follow up. As a result, our relationship has delivered fewer and fewer of the results that matter to the American people.
At the same time, the relationship became increasingly imbalanced. An example is unequal access for U.S. companies, journalists, diplomats, and even civil society. As an open society, the United States has welcomed Chinese companies into our markets to sell products to American consumers, to invest and bid on projects, and to raise capital. We have welcomed Chinese students and researchers into our universities and laboratories, where they have acquired knowledge to modernizeand develop China’s economy. While U.S. journalists face restrictions on reporting and even entering China, Chinese state media workers have long enjoyed open access in the United States. PRC diplomats have open access to American society, while our diplomats in China are required to navigate a state approval system for even the most basic engagements with the Chinese people.
The Chinese government, while benefiting from our openness, has exploited it – in a way that is increasingly inconsistent with international norms. Some Chinese entities have purchased American companies not to create jobs, but to acquire technology that is then taken back to China and developed to compete against us. Some Chinese companies have raised money on our stock exchanges yet refused to
subject themselves to the standard auditing rules required by all other listed companies, U.S. or foreign. A small number of Chinese students and researchers use access to our universities, research facilities and companies to steal American intellectual property. These actions have not only harmed our bilateral relations but also tarnished the remarkable legitimate economic progress that the Chinese people are rightfully proud of.
President Trump came to office vowing to make the overall relationship more balanced and reciprocal. The phase one trade deal and recent U.S. policy actions are an important step in our quest to create a genuine level playing field for American stakeholders. Many claim this is an effort to thwart China’s legitimate development aspirations, to “contain” China’s rise, or to “decouple” from China. This is categorically false. The root cause of the current tensions in the relationship is China’s longstanding strategy of only selectively “coupling” with the United States and systematically controlling the access of Americans to Chinese society. At our universities, we continue to welcome the vast majority of Chinese students, but we have taken action to deny visas to those who illegally acquire U.S. intellectual property and research results, or who gain knowledge in order to compete unfairly with us in the cutting edge technologies of the 21st century. We have also taken action against Chinese companies, including well known ones like Huawei, that have stolen U.S. intellectual property, circumvented U.S. export controls, or posed a threat to the security of our citizens’ private data and our communication networks.
We are two different nations with different pasts. The United States continues to learn from its mistakes and push forward to forge a better future. We hope that China can do the same. In this endeavor, we will need to build a foundation for understanding and true reciprocity. It must start with the Chinese government being willing to address our concerns about the imbalance in the relationship and allowing our two peoples to build relationships through unrestricted engagement and uncensored discussion. Only then will I enjoy the freedoms to engage the Chinese people that we guarantee Ambassador Cui in the United States, and only then will we have genuine reciprocity and a genuinely balanced relationship.
President Trump came to office vowing to make the overall relationship more balanced and reciprocal. The phase one trade deal and recent U.S. policy actions are an important step in our quest to create a genuine level playing field for American stakeholders. Many claim this is an effort to thwart China’s legitimate development aspirations, to “contain” China’s rise, or to “decouple” from China. This is categorically false. The root cause of the current tensions in the relationship is China’s longstanding strategy of only selectively “coupling” with the United States and systematically controlling the access of Americans to Chinese society. At our universities, we continue to welcome the vast majority of Chinese students, but we have taken action to deny visas to those who illegally acquire U.S. intellectual property and research results, or who gain knowledge in order to compete unfairly with us in the cutting edge technologies of the 21st century. We have also taken action against Chinese companies, including well known ones like Huawei, that have stolen U.S. intellectual property, circumvented U.S. export controls, or posed a threat to the security of our citizens’ private data and our communication networks.
We are two different nations with different pasts. The United States continues to learn from its mistakes and push forward to forge a better future. We hope that China can do the same. In this endeavor, we will need to build a foundation for understanding and true reciprocity. It must start with the Chinese government being willing to address our concerns about the imbalance in the relationship and allowing our two peoples to build relationships through unrestricted engagement and uncensored discussion. Only then will I enjoy the freedoms to engage the Chinese people that we guarantee Ambassador Cui in the United States, and only then will we have genuine reciprocity and a genuinely balanced relationship.
